About this notebook
Last revised August 2026
AI Casino Answers exists to answer one narrow question in public, what do AI assistants actually tell people about casinos, and how is that changing? It is a notebook in the literal sense. Entries are numbered, dated, and revised in place when later runs contradict them, with the revision noted. Nothing here is a guide, a review, or a recommendation. If an operator's name appears in an entry, it appears as data.
Editorial rules
The log follows five rules, written down here so readers can hold the entries to them.
First, frozen inputs. Prompt sets are fixed per quarter and published in the entries that use them. Changing a prompt mid-quarter would make month-over-month comparison meaningless, so it does not happen, even when a prompt turns out to be badly worded. Bad prompts get retired at the quarter boundary and their runs are marked.
Second, repetition before publication. A behaviour appears in an entry only after it held across multiple runs and at least two phrasings. Assistants produce one-off oddities constantly. The raw log keeps them, the published entries do not lean on them.
Third, verbatim preservation. Assistant answers are stored as given, with dates and model versions. Paraphrase is fine for summary but every quantified statement in an entry traces to stored transcripts.
Fourth, no pay-to-appear of any kind. No entity can pay to be tested, to be excluded from testing, or to have results softened. The query panel is chosen for what it reveals about assistant behaviour, not for who it names.
Fifth, corrections stay visible. When an entry is revised, the original claim is struck through or annotated, not silently deleted. A notebook that erases its own errors is worthless as a record.
Scope
The panel currently covers five assistants and three regulated markets, chosen because their regulators publish usable registers. Markets where licensing status cannot be independently checked are out of scope, an entry about them could not meet the rules above. The panel composition is reviewed each January.
Contact and reuse
Entries may be quoted with a link to the entry quoted. Requests for raw log extracts are considered case by case, redacted where a transcript could identify an individual session. There is no newsletter, no comments, and no tracking on this site, the pages you read are the whole of it.